0

Discussion topic: WiFi6 Router

Reply
This message was authored by TechmanagerMal This message was authored by: TechmanagerMal

WiFi6 Router

I see the Vodaphone WiFi6E Router is now available, what news on the Sky offering?

Passing on the tips I have learned in over 24 years as a more than satisfied Sky customer.



Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by GD1 This message was authored by: GD1

Re: WiFi6 Router

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@TechmanagerMal  Nothing has been released by Sky.

Like you I'm a customer here, Sky Employees are clearly identified as such.
43" Glass TV & Puck Whole Home
Please note I only provide help on the main forums and not via PM, PM's are switched off.


This message was authored by TimmyBGood This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: WiFi6 Router

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@TechmanagerMal 

Vodafone as an ISP is something like a sixth of the size of Sky, and has a correspondingly lower hardware demand.  Neither Sky or BT is likely to have a WiFi 6 router any time soon: it appears they just can't get a large enough batch manufactured to meet the expected demand.

 

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by Mr+Slant This message was authored by: Mr+Slant

Re: WiFi6 Router

I suspect an additional reason for not supplying 802.11ax routers is that Sky can see what customers are connecting to their routers and the vast majority of devices aren't ax (or even ac) capable. The only exceptions to this would be mobile phones and fairly recent laptops.

 

Makes no sense to supply more expensive routers when the benefits of them would be marginal at best.

 

Frankly if you want decent wifi then go and buy a decent access point & turn the wifi off on the ISP-supplied router because you're never going to get what I'd define as "decent" wifi from a device built to the budget mass-market ISPs require.

 

YMMV of course.

This message was authored by cookiemonsteruk This message was authored by: cookiemonsteruk

Re: WiFi6 Router

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Mr+Slant 

 

True, but the inclusion of ofdma, mu-mimo and the fact that you would be able to push the 5ghz channels further up the freq range would benefit 5ghz ac

----------------------------------------------------
Sky Stream , Sky Superfast, SR203 router, Tp link td w9970 + Asus RT AX58U (backup), Xbox Series X, google home mini, LG 43 inch UHD tv, samsung a5 2017 and samsung s21

If I get it right mark as answered
If I get it wrong humour me
If I say something you like give a thumbs up
This message was authored by Mr+Slant This message was authored by: Mr+Slant

Re: WiFi6 Router

@cookiemonsteruk 

 

Have you considered the reasons why ISPs don't generally enable DFS channels?

 

If not then its ALL to do with customer support.

 

How do you explain to the average punter that if you choose a certain range of channels then there's a 10 minute dwell time while checking for radar?

 

Likewise what happens when the router detects radar, switches to another DFS channel and there's a dwell time of 1-10 minutes before 5GHz wifi is available?

 

If you know what you're doing you can (on a decent AP) use channels 100 upwards and legally use 5 times the output power you can on C32-64. Radio has to support that, so extra cost. No reason to use those channels otherwise unless you're looking for frequency seperation in a multiple AP scenario. Edit - or you're using the AP outdoors in the UK where its mandatory to use C100 upwards (you can & WILL get hit with large fines if you contravene this within range of an airport).

 

All about customer support in terms of DFS channels really 🙂

This message was authored by TimmyBGood This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: WiFi6 Router

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Mr+Slant wrote:

 

Makes no sense to supply more expensive routers when the benefits of them would be marginal at best.

A more pressing pain point for ISPs is probably Apple devices shouting about the absence of WPA3.

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by Mr+Slant This message was authored by: Mr+Slant

Re: WiFi6 Router

@TimmyBGood 

 

True enough although WPA3 in a domestic environment isn't exactly a pressing issue in terms of security or overheads.

 

Apple fans aren't exactly noted for being "quiet" right enough 😉

Reply

Was this discussion not helpful?

No problem. Browse or search to find help, or start a new discussion on Community.

Start a new discussion

On average, new discussions are replied to by our users within 4 hours

New Discussion