@CnPx wrote:
Being honest Sky glass isn't worth it imo. If you break down your contract cost and work out how much your paying for the TV. You would be better off buying a TV and subscribing to Sky Q. You would have a better TV and Sky Q.
Plus Sky Glass is terrible for gamers and a huge percentage of people including myself have a games consoles in their living room. I don't know why the Sky Glass doesn't have an option to switch a HDMI port into peformance/gaming mode. What this does is it lowers certain display enchancements so it can render frames faster, lowering the input latency. In a less nerdy way of explaining things. It lowers the quality so it runs faster.
Tbh without a Sky glass subscription the TV is basically a giant paper weight. Its a huge buzzkill not having a performance mode and being limited to 60hz. Its not a bad TV if your only using it for TV. But you can buy a decent 4k TV with all the other bells and whistles far cheaper then what Sky is offering it for. And you would be able to use it for gaming aswell.
HI @CnPx , really couldn't disagree more regards the "terrible for gamers" comment..
I've had the TV since launch, and id say its probably used 50% for gaming at the moment via a XBox series X, i get what you're saying though regards a game mode and limited to 60hz, but i've found it to be more than capable even without these two, visually looks great, plays smooth, and online with no ( in my eyes ) visible lag.
My son has an xbox set up in his room, connected to a gaming monitor , with 120hz / gamemode, but i often find him playing on the glass set up for the big screen appeal, and he finds multiplayer COD / Halo all good, as do i,.
as said, cant disagree it would be good to have both, and it would benifit from it, but for an all rounder it does very very well.... imo obviously lol.