0

Discussion topic: “HD pack” monthly charge

Reply
This message was authored by: Nightcrawler

“HD pack” monthly charge

Why - in 2024 - are we still being charged £14 pm extra to receive HD channels? Most channels broadcast in HD as standard these days. Over a year this amounts to £168!!

Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by: Daniel0210

Re: “HD pack” monthly charge

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Nightcrawler 

Sky choose to display the HD charge separately. For new customers I believe the HD add-on is £9 before discounts. 


▪️I AM NOT A SKY EMPLOYEE (undercover or otherwise) ▪️
Sky customer since 2001
with: Sky Q | Sky Superfast Broadband | Sky Talk | Sky Mobile
NOTE: I only provide help on the forums and NOT via PM
This message was authored by: PandJ2020

Re: “HD pack” monthly charge

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Nightcrawler wrote:

Why - in 2024 - are we still being charged £14 pm extra to receive HD channels? Most channels broadcast in HD as standard these days. Over a year this amounts to £168!!


The flip side being if you don't want HD then you can save £168pa...  (Many do)

I am just another Sky customer and my views are my own even if you don't like the answers
This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: “HD pack” monthly charge

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Nightcrawler 

 

Realistically because it's built into the pricing model and hence Sky/Comcast profit margins: removing it would either result in a significant drop in revenue or necessitate increasing the price of the base package by a commensurate amount.

 

It's also worth noting that for satellite broadcasting in particular, HD transmission does have a higher cost to the channels because more data transits the orbital platforms.

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by: PandJ2020

Re: “HD pack” monthly charge

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@TimmyBGood wrote:

@Nightcrawler 

It's also worth noting that for satellite broadcasting in particular, HD transmission does have a higher cost to the channels because more data transits the orbital platforms.


And UHD even more so 😁

I am just another Sky customer and my views are my own even if you don't like the answers
Reply