It's not so much I'm not grasping this.
Ok let me put it this way, imagine if television couldn't be streamed at all, are we saying in 2029 or beyond that that Sky without a satellite would just dissolve into nothing?
Obviously up to this point Sky have relied on a satellite, and was never broadcasting via an aerial, but if I'm honest I'm seriously concerned from Sky's point of view because I don't think broadband is robust enough for the entire Sky platform to broadcast from.
So its not so much I refuse to grasp this, I do have genuine concerns about the future for Sky, as I think they are heading down the nieve route of streaming their service to millions of customers that don't yet have the reliable broadband service to carry the weight of millions of customers if I'm making sense?
To put it another way where I live at peak times when everyone is at home all using the Internet our broadband speeds drop dramatically. But imagine millions of Sky customers all pulling from the same source or area. Its going to cause major buffering or power intensive broadband stations, all of which will be unreliable and power intensive and bad for the planet / environment.
Its bad enough the government is pushing for electric cars, the power plants won't cope.
