U & Dave etc

[Doc5907]

---

@lettice wrote:

---

@Mister_Dalek wrote:

This really made me smile - it's very well done. Simple, cleverly done, gets the point across, and Cher looks like she's having a ball (probably due to her humongous fee) 

Much better than Sky's recent Andrew Garfield campaign which is, for me, utterly baffling. 

---

Yes, that is done very well, enjoyed it.

Agree on the recent Sky one if it's the one about a train. Its a bit naff and yes baffling is the right choice to describe it.

No idea on who the guy is in it, if is that his name, not heard of him.

---

@lettice 

He's the main character (medic) in what I thought was a Good war film... Hacksaw Ridge 

[Mister_Dalek]

---

@Doc5907 wrote:

---

@lettice wrote:

---

@Mister_Dalek wrote:

This really made me smile - it's very well done. Simple, cleverly done, gets the point across, and Cher looks like she's having a ball (probably due to her humongous fee) 

Much better than Sky's recent Andrew Garfield campaign which is, for me, utterly baffling. 

---

Yes, that is done very well, enjoyed it.

Agree on the recent Sky one if it's the one about a train. Its a bit naff and yes baffling is the right choice to describe it.

No idea on who the guy is in it, if is that his name, not heard of him.

---

@lettice 

He's the main character (medic) in what I thought was a Good war film... Hacksaw Ridge 

---

Agreed! He was also Spiderman (and dated Emma Stone) for a bit, and was very good in tick tick Boom! and Under The Banner Of Heaven.

[cjtsmith]

I'm sure people will cope. They got used to the name Dave pretty quickly in 2007 when it changed from UKTV G2.

[CoderTesterLD]

It was probably they wanted a Last hurra as they have stopped broadcasting (Midlands: West Midlands & East Midlands since Sunday , Dec 09th, 2024) mostly out 08am -04am GMT with strength of broadcast signal about 500 billion times less power  (2 picoWatts per previous Watt allowed) (strength of & quality of  signal have both lost at least 64 Decibels compared to September), Sky should get a few GigaHertz more (in exchange for a fair share of its revenue) more for the free -to receive channels, they get less bandwidth than the many kiloHertz of the BBC Radio who pays nothing for its  use of hundreds of GigaHertz of bandwidth they don't pay anything for out of their huge revenue per each kiloHertz of Bandwith used, the figures shows that it is very unfair, regardless of the BBC having kept a very large share of its audience, especially in the 750 months of the years 1948 to 2019.