0

Discussion topic: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Reply
This message was authored by ZyloKai This message was authored by: ZyloKai

Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

First and foremost, I do understand that I am speaking to other customers in this forum. My hope is that, by chance, someone from Sky will see this and consider my suggestion.


If satellite is truly dying, why should Sky need to fork out money to produce Sky Stream boxes and give them for free to customers in 2028 when their contract with SES is finished? This is similar to a free upgrade from Sky+HD to Sky Q when Sky+HD boxes became obsolete. They could create a Sky Stream App on Sky Q to prepare for the transition in 2028, if Sky is closing its satellite services.

Not only that, customers would have some use and knowledge of Sky Stream (from the Sky Q app) when the change is inevitable, giving customers some knowledge of how to use it beforehand. This would be especially useful for those who are not tech savvy.

If Sky were smart, they could use this to show HD channels (where there is an SD equivalent)  and change the HD pack to the Sky Stream pack where customers could see only HD channels.  They could also add stream only channels that are on the likes of Freeview. 

Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by MarkGoldsmith This message was authored by: MarkGoldsmith

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

Sky Stream boxes are produced on a mass scale quite cheaply, likely more cost effective production for Sky then the Sky + or Sky W boxes ever were.

 

Even if Sky did waive some or all of the £40 fee to encourage Sky + or Q customers from moving over to Stream, they financially wouldn't be losing out as much , particularly considering your suggestion which would require additional infrastructure and development costs.

 

One thing it remember is that the Strewn puck is essentially the standard now that Comcast are rolling out globally in all their subsidiaries, so creating something custom for the small satellite market they own globally would be more expensive in the long run.

Sky Stream user. Former Sky+ HD and Sky Broadband customer

Please LIKE any responses you found helpful

Please mark a response as an ANSWER if it has solved your query/issue


Please note: I am a fellow sky customer and NOT an employee. Posts from Sky Employees are clearly marked as such using a Sky badge.
If you would like to post a “Send Your Thanks to Sky” message please click Here
This message was authored by TimmyBGood This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@ZyloKai wrote:

This is similar to a free upgrade from Sky+HD to Sky Q when Sky+HD boxes became obsolete. 


Getting Q in its 2016 launch year certainly wasn't 'free': the 'installation and activation fee' was unpleasantly expensive (I think I was initially quoted £249 for the 'Q Silver' bundle of the UHD 2TB plus one Mini) although the headline cost typically reduced if additional subscription service (Cinema or Sports) was included.

 

Extra Costs

 

If you decide to opt for Sky Q, you won’t just be paying for your monthly contract.

 

Installing the next-generation Sky set-up in your home isn’t free. Customers opting for the basic Sky Q bundle will face a one-time £249 fee, dubbed Smart Features. This is on-top of the £50 installation cost.

 

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/641041/Sky-Q-Buyers-Guide-Silver-Box-Price-S... 

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by Chrisee This message was authored by: Chrisee

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@ZyloKai its an interesting idea but given Sky have not said anything public about the future of satellite broadcasting it is somewhat premature. I have my doubts such an app could be run on a Q box as the Stream platform uses very different technology and hardware. 

For anyone interested in the future of TV distribution may find this Ofcom report interesting https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/future-of-tv-distribution#:~:text=T....

although a lot of it is about DTT later sections discuss satellite and the future of Freesat. 

Once Sky stop selling Q which is likely to be at least 3 years before a major reduction in satellite channels we may learn more. My guess is sometime in 2025. 

=========================================================
65inch Sky Glass, 3 Sky Streaming Pucks, Sky Ultrafast + and Sky SR213(white Wifi Max hub) main Wifi from 3 TP-Link Deco M4 units in access point mode
This message was authored by nigea99 This message was authored by: nigea99

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

hi @ZyloKai 

 

I understand where you are coming from but as the others have said the cost of production of SKY Stream boxes is quite (if not very) cheap .

 

They are a multinational product with a UK flavour of the software

 

I don't think the cost of trying to shoehorn Stream type access for live channels onto what is in tech terms a quite  old product now,  which wasn't designed for it just wouldn't be worth it

 

 

 

This message was authored by Padam_Padam This message was authored by: Padam_Padam

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Comcast will never spend time and money developing an app for an obsolete satellite PVR, designed by the previous Sky administration. 

Their sole focus is on their own hardware. The Stream puck and the streaming platform infrastructure is entirely their baby. Sky Q is dead to them. 

 

This message was authored by TimmyBGood This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Padam_Padam 

 

Turns out taking M&A advice from a cab driver and the sales rep at a shopping centre stall might not be ideal ; )

 

https://news.sky.com/story/how-a-cabbie-convinced-comcasts-boss-to-reach-for-the-sky 

 

Can't think why though: they are usually so reliable as information sources...

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by Padam_Padam This message was authored by: Padam_Padam

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion


@TimmyBGood wrote:

@Padam_Padam 

 

Turns out taking M&A advice from a cab driver and the sales rep at a shopping centre stall might not be ideal ; )

 

https://news.sky.com/story/how-a-cabbie-convinced-comcasts-boss-to-reach-for-the-sky 

 

Can't think why though: they are usually so reliable as information sources...


Hilarious! What a story!

This message was authored by nolte This message was authored by: nolte

Re: Satellite dying? - Future-proof suggestion

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@TimmyBGood wrote:

@Padam_Padam 

 

Turns out taking M&A advice from a cab driver and the sales rep at a shopping centre stall might not be ideal ; )

 

https://news.sky.com/story/how-a-cabbie-convinced-comcasts-boss-to-reach-for-the-sky 

 

Can't think why though: they are usually so reliable as information sources...


It's the Joe Kennedy quote about the shoeshine boys giving stock tips, which was why he sold them in early 1929

---------
ROI sky Q Customer.
If you have questions about Sky, please post on the forums and do not send me private messages about them. I'm only a customer like you.
Reply

Was this discussion not helpful?

No problem. Browse or search to find help, or start a new discussion on Community.

Start a new discussion

On average, new discussions are replied to by our users within 5 hours

New Discussion