0

Discussion topic: Sky Q

Reply
This message was authored by: JamesInglett

Sky Q

I have been told the cable for Sky Q is standard coax. I wondered if the first cable I ran which I took to be coax will be ok for the new Sky Q installation

Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by: Chodley

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

Twin and satellite standard?

This message was authored by: nigea99

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@JamesInglett wrote:

I have been told the cable for Sky Q is standard coax. I wondered if the first cable I ran which I took to be coax will be ok for the new Sky Q installation


hi @JamesInglett 

 

I am not quite sure what you mean by standard co-ax - Satellite receivers won't work with TV Aerial co-ax for example.

 

SKY Q needs to use two cables - SKY install twin cable.

 

Is there any reason you laying the cable yourself ?

 

If laying cable yourself we usually recommend a cable with reference WF100 although for normal length installation WF65 should be sufficient

Avatar for JamesInglett
Level 1 icon
Topic Author
This message was authored by: JamesInglett

Re: Sky Q

Thanks tor that I received information from a Sky employee that the cable was coax & a 7mm holr would be enough room to fit the cable through. This must be wrong ,I should have acceptrd the offer from the Sky engineer to leave a coil, & I could have ran that.

This message was authored by: nigea99

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@JamesInglett wrote:

Thanks tor that I received information from a Sky employee that the cable was coax & a 7mm holr would be enough room to fit the cable through. This must be wrong ,I should have acceptrd the offer from the Sky engineer to leave a coil, & I could have ran that.


hmmm - I thought the standard hole used by the installers for SKy Q is 10mm - 7mm seems too small for twin cable/2 cables

 

I will tag our kind expert @Godfrey as I think he should be able to confirm

 

Edit : BTW Satellite Cable is coax but coax covers many  cables with different sizes and shielding etc. :

coax cable wiki 

Avatar for JamesInglett
Level 1 icon
Topic Author
This message was authored by: JamesInglett

Re: Sky Q

Again thanks

This message was authored by: Godfrey

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@JamesInglett   Each CT63 / WF65 coaxial cable has a nominal outer diameter of 4.8mm, so the standard CT63 / WF65 twin 'Shotgun' cable will require a 10 mm hole.

 

Whereas, the lower loss CT100 / WF100 coaxial cable has a nominal outer diameter of 6.6 mm, so each of these cables would require a 7mm hole, or two of these would require a nominal 15 mm hole.

 

Godfrey.

This message was authored by: nigea99

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Godfrey wrote:

@JamesInglett   Each CT63 / WF65 coaxial cable has a nominal outer diameter of 4.8mm, so the standard CT63 / WF65 twin 'Shotgun' cable will require a 10 mm hole.

 

Godfrey.


Many thanks @Godfrey - much appreciated.

Avatar for JamesInglett
Level 1 icon
Topic Author
This message was authored by: JamesInglett

Re: Sky Q

Thanks to both the 7mm hole is the one exsisting from my first cable instalation for Sky+, that I ran through my loft & trunked internally. I was hoping this route could be used again using the cable in it,but I will need to drill a larger hole instead.

This message was authored by: Chodley

Re: Sky Q

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@JamesInglett wrote:

Thanks to both the 7mm hole is the one exsisting from my first cable instalation for Sky+, that I ran through my loft & trunked internally. I was hoping this route could be used again using the cable in it,but I will need to drill a larger hole instead.


Sounds like that was old school pre-Sky+ single cable.

Reply