0

This discussion topic is read only Discussion topic: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Reply
Locked

This discussion has been locked

Sorry, you can't reply to this discussion as it's been locked by our Community Managers.

Reply
This message was authored by: CyberFriday

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Not sure if I misssed it in their published details. But nothing about screen brightness. Not that unusual for tvs not to have that figure published. But would have through Sly would have keen to sing its praises re getting a good HDR experience.

This message was authored by: fizzdisco

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box


@CyberFriday wrote:

Not sure if I misssed it in their published details. But nothing about screen brightness. Not that unusual for tvs not to have that figure published. But would have through Sly would have keen to sing its praises re getting a good HDR experience.


Particularly as they're now charging £5 a month for HDR with Sky Glass...

This message was authored by: bradleyestn

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Just some quick questions if anyone has the answers:

 

1. I am currently with Sky Q and some packages in contract until 2022. If I do decide to jump to Glass, do I have to wait until I am out of contract? (No idea if I am in contract with SkyQ)

 

2. Will the current multiroom add on convert to the new 'puck multiroom'?

 

3. with there being no boxes, if I do move house is is at simple as just moving the TV? No need to arrange a Sky Move?

 

4. what is fast forward ads? Why would anyone want this or are Sky implementing their own ads on top of the current tv ads during shows?

This message was authored by: Neath1965

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Gut feeling about this, it will be as successful as 3D TV...

The TVs themselves seem to be lower spec than what you can get from the likes of Samsung, LG, etc for the same price.

Would have thought just having the puck to plug into your existing tv would have been better, and probably will be where we go in a couple of years when this experiment has failed.

Just my opinion.

This message was authored by: Q-tips

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box


@rscott wrote:

@Q-tips wrote:

@rscott wrote:

@Q-tips wrote:

@rscott wrote:

TV and pucks both have ethernet ports.  There's quite a bit of technical info here - https://www.sky.com/glass/technical-specifications/55inch?contract=48months&irct=glassHome-glass-tec...


They don't say what speed the internet ports support. I hope they have taken the opportunity to upgrade them to gigabit ports.


What would be the benefit of gigabit when the most they'd need is 25-30Mbit/s to stream UHD HDR content?


If that's true, why hasn't it been possible to stream UHD HDR to a Mini over the current Q system?


Because the ethernet speed isn't the issue with streaming UHD HDR to minis?

That requires the minis support UHD (which they don't - the output chipset only supports 1080) .

There's also not been official confirmation from Sky as to whether the Q box could stream UHD satellite content (whether live or recorded) to another device.

 

Pucks will get the video stream directly from source (be that Sky or Netflix) and not via the Glass. They'll just communicate with that to ensure the puck and Glass are on the same network.


Even so it would have been a simple upgrade (possibly even via firmware) to make the Minis UHD capable. But it would have been incredibly short-sighted of Sky not to build that capability in from the start, even if it was hidden.

 

And if they are going to expand the functionality of the pucks to make them also act as hotspots for Sky broadband customers, then 10/100 is slow and old.

 

Meanwhile, anyone with three different TVs all independently streaming different UHD content at the same time is going to need a lot more than 30Mbps coming into the house.

--------------------
32B12C 2TB UHD Q box • Mini boxes x2 (32D0B2) • 2022 LG C2 OLED TV • Software vQ230.000.14.00L • Gigaclear gigabit FTTH broadband (935Mbps up/down) • Linksys Velop tri-band router; 3 mesh nodes • All Q boxes fully Cat6 hardwired • Q wi-fi disabled • Q picture/audio processing disabled (no sound bar) • Pixellation cured by Q170 but back again with Q190 and now every few minutes with Q210 and Q220 live broadcasts and recordings on all boxes
This message was authored by: rscott

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Q-tips wrote:

@rscott wrote:

@Q-tips wrote:

@rscott wrote:

@Q-tips wrote:

@rscott wrote:

TV and pucks both have ethernet ports.  There's quite a bit of technical info here - https://www.sky.com/glass/technical-specifications/55inch?contract=48months&irct=glassHome-glass-tec...


They don't say what speed the internet ports support. I hope they have taken the opportunity to upgrade them to gigabit ports.


What would be the benefit of gigabit when the most they'd need is 25-30Mbit/s to stream UHD HDR content?


If that's true, why hasn't it been possible to stream UHD HDR to a Mini over the current Q system?


Because the ethernet speed isn't the issue with streaming UHD HDR to minis?

That requires the minis support UHD (which they don't - the output chipset only supports 1080) .

There's also not been official confirmation from Sky as to whether the Q box could stream UHD satellite content (whether live or recorded) to another device.

 

Pucks will get the video stream directly from source (be that Sky or Netflix) and not via the Glass. They'll just communicate with that to ensure the puck and Glass are on the same network.


Even so it would have been a simple upgrade (possibly even via firmware) to make the Minis UHD capable. But it would have been incredibly short-sighted of Sky not to build that capability in from the start, even if it was hidden.

 

And if they are going to expand the functionality of the pucks to make them also act as hotspots for Sky broadband customers, then 10/100 is slow and old.

 

Meanwhile, anyone with three different TVs all independently streaming different UHD content at the same time is going to need a lot more than 30Mbps coming into the house.


It really wouldn't have been that simple an upgrade - the V1 UHD boxes can't even be upgraded to HDR support (because the chipset used couldn't be upgraded thanks to a late change to HLG specs). 

Using UHD compatible chipsets in all the minis would have increased the price too - look at how much extra Amazon charge for 4k Fire sticks, for example.

 

But we don't know for sure that the mini is the only limitation -the minis get their Sky content from the main box, so that would need to be able to stream UHD. There's strong suggestions that the chipset in that can't do it.

This message was authored by: bemak187

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Current Q minis are tech from 2016.  Dont think they would cope with 4K and doubt they can even do HDR.

This message was authored by: Vegeta

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

I wonder how quickly the physical sky stores will get sky glass in for customers to view? 

You would think they would want them in quickly given the release is less than 2 weeks away. 

cleary we all have questions/concerns about the actual TVs capabilities in terms of picture and sound quality. I can't see too many people buying immediately without actually seeing it in person. I guess a few unbiased reviews will help aswell. 

I'm surprised so many people are certain the tv element will fail. Sky don't generally have a large history of failing and this product seems like it has had. Ncredinle amount of time put into it. They clearly want people to convert from Q to glass so it needs to be good to make us want to do that. Even if many of us have glass in the bedroom and a puck in the living room if you want to keep your superior tv. Though that does remove much of the appeal of the glass in the first place surely...

my current sky Q reduced price contract is expiring and I need to contact sky about lowering the price again or leaving by the end of the month. Part of me doesn't want to do that if this product ends up being good. 

This message was authored by: tarbat

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

I wonder if the pucks will still work if they can't find a Sky Glass TV on the local network?  A couple of scenarios:

  1. The Sky Glass TV is broken/not working.
  2. The Sky Glass TV has been sold.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TARBAT's SETUP....................Sky Q 2tb v3
Panasonic 65” GZ1500 OLED TV : Yamaha YSP-2700 Soundbar (ARC) : BT Smart Hub 2 & FTTP 900 : BT Disc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sky Community Superuser. 26 Years Diamond VIP

This message was authored by: rscott

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@tarbat wrote:

I wonder if the pucks will still work if they can't find a Sky Glass TV on the local network?  A couple of scenarios:

  1. The Sky Glass TV is broken/not working.
  2. The Sky Glass TV has been sold.

I doubt it. They probably have strong local network checking like Q to prevent use at different locations.

This message was authored by: tarbat

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Expect we'll see people selling their Pucks on an auction site and the buyers wondering why they don't work.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TARBAT's SETUP....................Sky Q 2tb v3
Panasonic 65” GZ1500 OLED TV : Yamaha YSP-2700 Soundbar (ARC) : BT Smart Hub 2 & FTTP 900 : BT Disc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sky Community Superuser. 26 Years Diamond VIP

This message was authored by: Neil+Stevens

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

surprised there's been no mention so far in the inadequate SkyQ router they currently provide and whether they will be providing a new model for Glass

This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Neil+Stevens 

 

Both Glass TV and the pucks are specified as WiFi6, which I think we can safely assume will be in all the next generation of ISP routers (along with WPA3), but timescale for those is currently a significant issue.

 

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2021/02/first-hints-of-future-wifi-6-bt-smarthub-3-broadband-r... 

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
This message was authored by: TomThumb5ive

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

I guess when re contracting sky Q,

if no substantial deals are to be had,

we will get an idea of how hard sky is trying to make the transition away from Q to Glass & puck.

 

Tom...

Sky want us to believe in better
BELIEVE =accept that (something) is true, especially without proof.
BETTER = of a higher standard, or more suitable, pleasing, or effective than other things or people:

Sky Q & 2 mini’s
SR203 router. > Replaced with ASUS XT9’s with a TP-Link TD-W9970 modem
Sky superfast 80/20 :sort of, 63-75/15. Devolo 1200 wifi > Replaced with cat 6
Sony KDAF8 65 oled.
This message was authored by: Neil+Stevens

Re: Sky to launch Sky Q without dish by Xmas based on Xfinity X1 box

not seen anything that says specifically wifi6, all the specs say is ethernet but guess wait and see 

Locked

This discussion has been locked

Sorry, you can't reply to this discussion as it's been locked by our Community Managers.

Reply