0

Discussion topic: Ubiquti Access Point

Reply
This message was authored by: ConnorJ_115

Ubiquti Access Point

I used to have a Ubiquti access point connected to the the sky hub to give better coverage to the garden and back of the house. However when we upgraded to fibre the sky engineer told my brother that we shouldnt be using the ubiquiti access point as it acts an emp to other peoples internet and can cause problems for other customers. Because of this my brother will not let me put it back in resulting in poor signal in the areas previously mentioned. Is there any truth to what the sky engineer said or is perfectly fine to use the access point?

Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Ubiquti Access Point

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@ConnorJ_115 wrote:

However when we upgraded to fibre the sky engineer told my brother that we shouldnt be using the ubiquiti access point as it acts an emp to other peoples internet and can cause problems for other customers. 


Nonsense.  Any wireless access point inevitably competes with other access point within broadcast range and all are designed to cope with this.  They have absolutely no effect on other customers of the same ISP unless these happen to live next door.

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
Avatar for ConnorJ_115
Level 1 icon
Topic Author
This message was authored by: ConnorJ_115

Re: Ubiquti Access Point

Thank you. This is what i thought!

This message was authored by: simon194

Re: Ubiquti Access Point


@TimmyBGood wrote:

@ConnorJ_115 wrote:

However when we upgraded to fibre the sky engineer told my brother that we shouldnt be using the ubiquiti access point as it acts an emp to other peoples internet and can cause problems for other customers. 


Nonsense.  Any wireless access point inevitably competes with other access point within broadcast range and all are designed to cope with this.  They have absolutely no effect on other customers of the same ISP unless these happen to live next door.


There is one legal issue with outdoor use of the 5GHz band that I found out recently when I was talking to one of our local council's IT guys who deals with the town's public wifi network. I was just interested why the 5Ghz band operated on channel 112 and not any of the lower 5GHz channels.

He told me it is illegal to use the Band A channels (36 - 64) outdoors so they use Band B (100 - 140) which is legal.

_____________________________________________________
Sky Q 2TB v2 (Q150.000.28.00L) + ; 2x Mini, Philips 55OLED806, Lumagen Radiance Pro 4242,
Yamaha RX-A3080 + NAD C270 (7.1.4)
This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Ubiquti Access Point

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@simon194 wrote:

He told me it is illegal to use the Band A channels (36 - 64) outdoors 


For a dedicated outdoor (weatherproof) PoE access point, I'd think.

 

It's not really feasible to legislate against signal leakage from indoor transmitters, although that's one reason they are limited in broadcast power output.

 

It's been a while since I've administered Ubiquiti APs, but from memory they have both a country and an indoor/outdoor setting option which then applies the appropriate national regulations.

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
Reply