0

Discussion topic: Fibre Upload Speed - why so low compared to download?

Reply
This message was authored by Wurst1 This message was authored by: Wurst1

Fibre Upload Speed - why so low compared to download?

We've been with Sky Full Fibre 500/Ultrafast Plus for several months, and in terms of reliability and speed it's generally been okay. Our minimum guaranteed download speed is 400mb, and we get around 450mb-500mb most days.

 

Our upload speed is around 45mb-65mb.

 

Which leads me to the question - why are Sky's fibre upload speed so much lower than the download speed we get?

 

I've used residential fibre in other countries where their upload and download speeds are almost idential - 500/450, even 999/950.

 

Why is this? Is there any way to change it using a router? 

 

Thanks

Sky Q 2TB + Sky FTTP
Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by TimmyBGood This message was authored by: TimmyBGood

Re: Fibre Upload Speed - why so low compared to download?

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Wurst1 

 

Fundamentally because the wholesale broadband providers on the Openreach network in the UK don't offer symmetrical connections at domestic prices to their ISP clients. Changing the router can have no effect because it's inherent to the underlying service: only moving to business provision ('leased line') at a much higher monthly cost gets faster upload.

 

Altnet ISPs are much more likely to provide symmetrical service on their own private networks.

* * * * * * *

Sky Glass 55" (on ethernet) & two Stream Pucks (one ethernet / one WiFi)
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
Reply

Was this discussion not helpful?

No problem. Browse or search to find help, or start a new discussion on Community.

Start a new discussion

On average, new discussions are replied to by our users within 4 hours

New Discussion