Description of film Nobody is wrong

[Roobarb1978]

I just went on to my Sky Store on my Sky Q box to watch Nobody again and noticed the description is completely wrong. I bought the film ages ago and it had the correct description so something has happened. I checked on Sky Cinema and it has the incorrect description too. It is very misleading and might stop people wanting to watch as it suggests sexual content which it doesn't have. This needs addressing by Sky.

[nolte · Accepted solution]

You could email viewer relations at viewerR@sky.uk as they should be able to look at correcting this.

[Daniel0210]

@Roobarb1978 

I would suggest emailing the Viewer Relations Team at viewerR@sky.uk

[Roobarb1978]

Thanks I'll give that a go. Wouldn't want anyone put off watching the brilliant Nobody especially with Nobody 2 about to be out in cinemas!

[nolte]

---

@Roobarb1978 wrote:

Thanks I'll give that a go. Wouldn't want anyone put off watching the brilliant Nobody especially with Nobody 2 about to be out in cinemas!

---

If this is with Bob odenkirk, the irish film classification office, does rate the sexual content as 'moderate'

BBFC classification include detail of the scene they describe as sexual

[Roobarb1978]

The whole description of the film is wrong. It's is describing a completely different film not Nobody. 

[TimmyBGood]

 

The BBFC specifies 'sex references' as a scene contains photographs of a man in a gimp mask and bondage, accompanied by a woman wearing a g-string

[TimmyBGood]

@Roobarb1978 

What description by Sky are you seeing?

[daveNOS]

This is the description i get from Sky store,

"A man who intervenes to help a woman being harassed becomes the target of a drug lord. Drama with Bob Odenkirk and Connie Nielsen.

Contains violence, strong language, mature themes."

Which is the very basics of the storyline.

[Roobarb1978]

It's not how I would describe the plot but in the cool light of day I can see how it sort of fits, although only tangentially. It's not the main thrust of the plot i would argue. But I did forget about the blackmail photos which I can see would trigger the sexual content warning. I suppose I was thinking of sex scenes of which there are none.