Discussion topic: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Message posted on 20 Oct 2025 01:15 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
Just wondering if I have to pay for sky hd and uhd
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
All Replies
Message posted on 20 Oct 2025 01:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
@Poppy2107 wrote:Just wondering if I have to pay for sky hd and uhd
No.
But without a UHD sub you won't be able to watch/download UHD material.
Without a HD sub then you won't be able to watch/download certain HD material.
Message posted on 20 Oct 2025 01:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
@Poppy2107 wrote:
Just wondering if I have to pay for sky hd and uhd
No, not if you want to only watch in SD. If you want to watch HD channels you'll need the HD add-on. If you want to watch anything in UHD you'll need the HD and UHD add-ons.
NOTE: I only provide help on the forum boards so Direct Messaging is switched off
▫️
Sky customer since 2001
with:
Sky Q | Sky Superfast Broadband | Sky Talk | Sky Mobile
▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️
MERRY CHRISTMAS and a HAPPY NEW YEAR
Message posted on 22 Oct 2025 08:54 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
I honestly can't believe they're still charging for this.
Their headline prices are attractive but then once you make it usable it's 2-4x the initial cost
Message posted on 22 Oct 2025 09:30 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
@plantpot wrote:
I honestly can't believe they're still charging for this.
Glass and Stream don't require a subscription supplement for HD.
If only half of satellite platform users pay for HD that's something like £500,000,000 a year loss in revenue if the charge was dropped, which I suspect Comcast Corporation stockholders might be unhappy about.
@plantpot wrote:
Their headline prices are attractive but then once you make it usable it's 2-4x the initial cost
Yup: that's been a successful marketing strategy for over three decades.
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
Message posted on 23 Oct 2025 07:43 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
Fair point on Stream/Glass and HD. I came here to look into that but the hardware sounds terrible with Stream and I am not interested in Glass.
It's funny you mentioned 3 decades - and since this is the Q forum... Sky's heyday was the late 90s and into the 2000s. I didn't have Sky at home when I was younger, and I remember how awesome it was to go round to a friends house on a Sunday evening to catch the Simpsons (before the C4 days even) or a movie that wouldn't be on 'normal' TV for at least another year.
But with the rise of a vast array of on demand content, substantailly more free to air channels, smart TVs, and so on...getting access to the entertainment we want has never been easier.
I cancelled my Q subscription a while back after taking it out when I moved in to a new property. They wanted to increase my price to over £60 a month for what was just glorified Freeview with Multiroom and HD. This was not inclusive of broadband.
They charge a lot for multi room and yet The Sky Q mini multiroom box was terrible - an inferior product which was laggy and did not support 4k output.
HD is not a premium service.
The discussion with the Sky agent was borderline desperation on their part. Suggesting I remove multiroom and take HD off my package 'if cost is a problem' - folks want decent value for money, not to feel ripped off and locked in while they are free to increase prices every year, especially when the extras are things as ubiquitous as HD.
I can honestly say, cancelling the service and saving the money has had literally zero negative impact on what we enjoy watching.
I really feel Sky have completely failed to adapt to the seismic shift in the way folks consume content and charge way too much for what is just a basic level of service. The nickel and diming is quite something. You can get almost all of the basic package with free to air and a smart TV with on demand apps for £0 per month. Adding one of Netflix/Prime/Disney (or even several) is still way way less. Yet they are even now doing "ad free" as an extra 🤣
I do however think that the current deal on essentials with broadband is pretty solid, but the premium demanded for multiroom makes a good deal turn bad.
I'd love to see a simplification of the bundles but I've no interest in giving them my business with their current model. These forums are littered with customers complaining about poor performance and spurious charges.
Message posted on 23 Oct 2025 07:50 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report post
Re: Have we got to pay for hd and uhd
@plantpot wrote:
I'd love to see a simplification of the bundles but I've no interest in giving them my business with their current model.
Q isn't going to change now: it will be gone in a few years. Glass/Stream was explicitly supposed to be a much simpler structure without revolving price changes, but that intention didn't actually emerge in reality.
Stream works for most households: by definition they aren't posting to support forums.
BT Halo 3+ Ultrafast FTTP (500Mbs), BT Smart Hub 2
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page