11 Feb 2025 08:15 PM
Hi, I joined sky broadband in a previous old house with solid brick walls. I could only get standard broadband with around 60mb. The WiFi was terrible and I could only get around 20mb so I left and went with BT and had full speed WiFi with their HUB 2.
I then moved to a smaller place where walls weren't as solid and got Sky full fibre and WiFi is great, so I'm confused.
Is the WiFi router for standard broadband different to full fibre?
I'm thinking of joining sky again at my new address I'm moving to but concerned that the same thing will happen before as it's an old property with solid walls. Has the WiFi routers for standard BB changed since around 2020?
Why would the BT router have been better at WiFi than the sky one at the time I had issues?
Would Sky Max WiFi give me the same performance as the BT HUB 2?
Thanks
11 Feb 2025 08:54 PM
Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out moreHi @Thevoid
Generally the BT hub seems to cover a wider area better so that would make sense if BT was better in a home where you had solid walls.
In terms of getting the same performance out of the Sky max hub, I would say its unlikely as most reports on the Sky max hub have suggested coverage isn't as good as the BT hub.
15 Feb 2025 10:09 PM
Why is the sky router so poor at WiFi?
16 Feb 2025 07:55 AM
Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more@Thevoid it isnt that bad in my experience but the new hub relies on the 5GHz band to give speed these are the first signals to be lost with solid walls leaving the 2.4GHz band. The system was developed in the US where internal walls are usually not solid shich maybe a factor.
Each router has pros and cons but in general BT/EE hubs sre better than Sky's which usually beat Virgin's but different properities different performance.
No problem. Browse or search to find help, or start a new discussion on Community.
On average, new discussions are replied to by our users within 4 hours
New Discussion