0

This discussion topic is read only Discussion topic: Sky Ultimate TV cost too much?

Reply
This message was authored by: Aaln

Sky Ultimate TV cost too much?

A few years ago you would pay for Sky and possibly rent a film once in a while.

 

Now you pay Sky, Disney, Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and others for your content.  Viewing TV has become more expensive than ever before.

Why does Sky charge £26 for their basic package when all others charge way less?

 

If sky were to lower to £16 per month without hdr atmos etc, i think more would sign up .

 

Locked

This discussion has been locked

Sorry, you can't reply to this discussion as it's been locked by our Community Managers.

Reply

All Replies

This message was authored by: Mark39

Re: Sky Ultimate TV cost too much?

Posted by a Superuser, not a Sky employee. Find out more

@Aaln wrote:

A few years ago you would pay for Sky and possibly rent a film once in a while.

 

Now you pay Sky, Disney, Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and others for your content.  Viewing TV has become more expensive than ever before.

Why does Sky charge £26 for their basic package when all others charge way less?

 

If sky were to lower to £16 per month without hdr atmos etc, i think more would sign up .

 


I suspect that Sky know more about their marketing strategy than you or I do! I've no doubt that if they saw the potential for better profits by reducing their subscription prices, they wouldn't hesitate to do so.

Locked

This discussion has been locked

Sorry, you can't reply to this discussion as it's been locked by our Community Managers.

Reply