<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SR203 0r 204 in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360478#M590484</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/65863"&gt;@generater&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 204 is a 203 with a G.fast-compatible modem rather than a VDSL2 version: they were released on the same date in 2019&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;G.fast always was much less common than FTTC, which is why there are far more 203 Hubs around.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally I'd think it's best to send the 204 back and swap to the 203 to keep Sky records straight.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 16:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimmyBGood</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-01T16:06:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SR203 0r 204</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360476#M590483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I currently have sky GFast 150 and have a full fibre 300 install on Thursday, i have the SR204 router which has performed faultlessly on the GFast but i recieved another router from Sky today which is the SR203 and would like to ask if i should keep the 204 working on the assumption that it might be the newer version hence the higher number&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 15:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360476#M590483</guid>
      <dc:creator>generater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-01T15:19:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SR203 0r 204</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360478#M590484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/65863"&gt;@generater&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 204 is a 203 with a G.fast-compatible modem rather than a VDSL2 version: they were released on the same date in 2019&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;G.fast always was much less common than FTTC, which is why there are far more 203 Hubs around.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally I'd think it's best to send the 204 back and swap to the 203 to keep Sky records straight.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 16:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360478#M590484</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimmyBGood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-01T16:06:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SR203 0r 204</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360494#M590488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Many thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 15:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/SR203-0r-204/m-p/5360494#M590488</guid>
      <dc:creator>generater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-01T15:46:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

