<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wifi Max Query in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909060#M466413</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Max router doesn't support Q &amp;amp; is much worse than the SR203 for native WiFi coverage. Just have a look at how threads on these forums are complaining about them. I can think of no reason for "upgrading".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was supplied one but bought an SR203 from Ebay &amp;amp; use that. .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FLC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-12T13:35:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wifi Max Query</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909030#M466409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can see that WiFi Max is supposidly offered to most customers now, previously wasn't able to select it due to having a Q box and mini box.&amp;nbsp; My question is A) does this now support Q boxes with mini boxes? and B) i'm on the max package i.e. gigabit, with the SR203 router - would the max router improve my wireless connections throughout the house, or is there no real point?&amp;nbsp; I've heard that the SR203 isn't suitable for gigabit but seem to get varying info online.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909030#M466409</guid>
      <dc:creator>WelshmanOfWar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-12T13:10:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wifi Max Query</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909060#M466413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Max router doesn't support Q &amp;amp; is much worse than the SR203 for native WiFi coverage. Just have a look at how threads on these forums are complaining about them. I can think of no reason for "upgrading".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was supplied one but bought an SR203 from Ebay &amp;amp; use that. .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909060#M466413</guid>
      <dc:creator>FLC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-12T13:35:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wifi Max Query</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909291#M466455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/954204"&gt;@WelshmanOfWar&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually Q television works as expected with a Max Hub acting as a router for internet access: what Max doesn't have is the proprietary 'Q mesh'.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/4909291#M466455</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimmyBGood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-12T16:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wifi Max Query</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/5031382#M501462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Given the time that has passed, i have checked today and seem to now be able to order the WiFi Max 'Upgrade' - i'm assuming it is now compatible with Sky Q unlike previously (i also have 1 mini box which is in the room directly above the main Sky Q box.&amp;nbsp; Also, has the performance of this router improved compared to previous poor reviews?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current layout i have is a Sky Q box in the living room, the router relatively close and connected, via ONT, with gigafast.&amp;nbsp; I also have a hard wired RJ45 going from the router to the upstairs into bedroom 1 for a signal booster and a sky mini box in bedroom 2 (directly above living room). *bedroom 1 and 2 are actually one single room split so both are esentially above the living room and bedroom 3 is the other side of the house*&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:18:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/5031382#M501462</guid>
      <dc:creator>WelshmanOfWar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-08T14:18:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wifi Max Query</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/5031390#M501466</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/954204"&gt;@WelshmanOfWar&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Given the time that has passed, i have checked today and seem to now be able to order the WiFi Max 'Upgrade' - i'm assuming it is now compatible with Sky Q unlike previously&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;That's correct: strictly speaking the Max Hub was always compatible as a router.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, has the performance of this router improved compared to previous poor reviews?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;There are still individual posts, but without knowing the number being deployed it's very difficult to know if that's an unexpected proportion.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-Max-Query/m-p/5031390#M501466</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimmyBGood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-08T14:26:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

