<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wifi booster quality in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-booster-quality/m-p/4892507#M461980</link>
    <description>TP LINK sorry and advised by BT open reach.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shelleybear</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-25T17:25:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wifi booster quality</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-booster-quality/m-p/4892504#M461979</link>
      <description>Hi all bt engineering recommended I request a booster as I'm struggling with signal in certain rooms. I've to links in the passed which quite frankly were poor. How good are these by comparison please &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":folded_hands:"&gt;🙏&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:21:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-booster-quality/m-p/4892504#M461979</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shelleybear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-25T17:21:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wifi booster quality</title>
      <link>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-booster-quality/m-p/4892507#M461980</link>
      <description>TP LINK sorry and advised by BT open reach.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Broadband/Wifi-booster-quality/m-p/4892507#M461980</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shelleybear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-25T17:25:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

